Since this week, so we know that the machine can play on the field of questions and answers with a blur in the context relevance and surprising speed. It fell yesterday by chance on a game show where a contestant had to remember the name of the country, its population, its capital and its lawful currency of flags from before it dawned on me that soon this archaic desire to see the capabilities of robotic memory hypertrophied encyclopedic information of candidates. And so, some experts ...
Watson has won . We do not yet see all the symbolic and actual changes that will bring. Here's a little back of what was said on the subject of smart this week.
This post follows my two previous reports on the subject: Exponential, my dear Watson and Watson first
expansion, Raphaële Karayan has collected about Jean-Gabriel Ganascia in cognitive science:
In his blog on Automata intelligent Le Monde, Jean-Paul Baquiast paints a realistic picture of future impacts on the world of work
That shows us that experience in artificial intelligence?
Jean-Gabriel Ganascia " Herbert Simon, a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University, who developed with Watson IBM had announced in 1957 that computers would become capable of writing music and to become world champions of chess. He retorted that it was impossible. And then there was Deep Blue . It then said: " not really intelligence, it's abstract and systematic calculation. True intelligence is language. "Here we see that a computer is capable in very concrete situations to cope so amazing."
Source
These are professionals who have expertise based on their ability to store information stored and make complex inferences (think doctors, lawyers, teachers, its appearance "question / answer "of their employment) who may fear the worst with comeback "expert systems".
What one might conclude on Artificial Intelligence .
John Paul Baquiast: "Contrary to what one believes , most threatened will those who today call for elaborate forms of natural language understanding and judgment based on considerable amounts of accumulated knowledge in their brains as well as in literature sources they use. "
Source
John Paul Baquiat remains skeptical of a computational approach based on "brute force" machine, facing the man who will always be more imaginative and creative.
That makes him say that Watson is not a form of artificial intelligence (simulated intelligence) but a form of increased intelligence (assembly and overlap of knowledge).
Have you read other intelligent conclusions on the subject?
0 comments:
Post a Comment