Thus, Watson won. The game show "Jeopardy", the machine has won against the top 2 participants general knowledge questions posed by the moderator. The electronic brains show once again their superiority. Really?
Render unto IBM that belongs to IBM: they succeeded in fifteen years to give two snub human intelligence. First by making Deep Blue chess master in 1997, they removed the rationality combinatorial human monopoly. The man only as being able to make strategic choices had to bite the dust. And today, the second defeat, the man who "knows everything" is returned with a dunce cap.
The first " harassment" has cooled the myth of expert chess as an intelligent man. Watch old films of the twentieth century and how they have "deified" good chess player.
The new "annoyance" give reason for supporters of pedagogy skills and not knowledge. Likely that further adjustment will move into the culture to "heal" our " narcissistic wound." The budding geniuses of this world would be so organic that OS soon overwhelmed by the iPad or ... Android.
I think we should rejoice to see these machines extend the intelligence of the human , while accepting that what we thought was exclusive is now shared with the brute force of computer computation. But this "intelligence" has more to do with the so-called IQ - which will soon be hard pressed to keep a bar & # 232; me measurement of the human being. We should instead focus on the true nature of human thought.
Human thought, said Harendt , lies in its ability to give meaning to world and interpret non-automatic. What is not given to the machine. But it better than we can decipher the complex data is no longer in doubt. It has mastered the words in a way that one might call semantics, too. The space left to humans is shrinking, perhaps, but it still leaves us in an interpretive field exclusively human.
The "disembodied intelligence human "definitely creates avenues that I dared not imagine 5 years ago *. But it forces us to redefine what th is meant by intelligence now.
Read on Zero Second
- Exponential, my dear Watson (my ticket last week)
* I corresponded with Vincent-Olivier in 2004 on the possibility that reductionism provided by artificial intelligence could decenter man from his pedestal to be intelligent. I argued that the aspect of human semiosis remains unsurpassable. But we must recognize that the news seems to go further in his direction. Here is my series of answers:
- Artificial intelligence and human semiosis
- Artificial intelligence and human semiosis-2
- Godel and the web semantic
0 comments:
Post a Comment